2021年5月6日,欧盟据欧盟食品安全局(EFSA)消息,重新欧盟食品添加剂和调味剂小组( FAF )重新评估了 二氧化钛(titanium dioxide )(E171)作为食品添加剂的评估品添安全性。 根据现有的氧化所有证据,不能排除该添加剂对遗传毒性的钛作担忧,鉴于存在许多不确定性,为食评估小组得出结论,加剂当E171用作食品添加剂时,全性不再被认为是欧盟安全的。部分原文报道如下: The 重新present opinion deals with an updated safety assessment of the food additive titanium dioxide (E 171) based on new relevant scientific evidence considered by the Panel to be reliable, including data obtained with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) and data from an extended one‐generation reproductive toxicity (EOGRT) study. Less than 50% of constituent particles by number in E 171 have a minimum external dimension < 100 nm. In addition, the Panel noted that constituent particles < 30 nm amounted to less than 1% of particles by number. The Panel therefore considered that studies with TiO2 NPs < 30 nm were of limited relevance to the safety assessment of E 171. The Panel concluded that although gastrointestinal absorption of TiO2 particles is low, they may accumulate in the body. Studies on general and organ toxicity did not indicate adverse effects with either E 171 up to a dose of 1,000 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day or with TiO2 NPs (> 30 nm) up to the highest dose tested of 100 mg/kg bw per day. No effects on reproductive and developmental toxicity were observed up to a dose of 1,000 mg E 171/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested in the EOGRT study. However, observations of potential immunotoxicity and inflammation with E 171 and potential neurotoxicity with TiO2 NPs, together with the potential induction of aberrant crypt foci with E 171, may indicate adverse effects. With respect to genotoxicity, the Panel concluded that TiO2 particles have the potential to induce DNA strand breaks and chromosomal damage, but not gene mutations. No clear correlation was observed between the physico‐chemical properties of TiO2 particles and the outcome of either in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity assays. A concern for genotoxicity of TiO2 particles that may be present in E 171 could therefore not be ruled out. Several modes of action for the genotoxicity may operate in parallel and the relative contributions of different molecular mechanisms elicited by TiO2 particles are not known. There was uncertainty as to whether a threshold mode of action could be assumed. In addition, a cut‐off value for TiO2 particle size with respect to genotoxicity could not be identified. No appropriately designed study was available to investigate the potential carcinogenic effects of TiO2 NPs. based on all the evidence available, a concern for genotoxicity could not be ruled out, and given the many uncertainties, the Panel concluded that E 171 can no longer be considered as safe when used as a food additive. 声明:本文所用图片、文字来源《食品伙伴网》,评估品添版权归原作者所有。氧化如涉及作品内容、钛作版权等问题,为食请与本网联系删除。加剂 相关链接:食品添加剂,调味剂,二氧化钛 |
家里装落地玻璃窗好不好 落地玻璃窗存在哪些问题,行业资讯该怎么制作双面磨砂玻璃 钢化玻璃质量的鉴别方法,行业资讯玻璃包装容器的生产流程 用玻璃容器能有什么好处,行业资讯浙江省“个体工商户服务月”暨“大企帮小店”活动启动北京丰台:全力保障中秋食品安全家里装落地玻璃窗好不好 落地玻璃窗存在哪些问题,行业资讯Saks Global 完成 27 亿美元收购 Neiman Marcus浙江省绍兴市上虞区开展开学季眼镜质量专项检查行动Saks Global 完成 27 亿美元收购 Neiman Marcus发布违法广告 四川淘联网络公司被罚6万元2023深圳玩具展新品:卡牌/纸板/木制玩具美尔雅货物:玻璃延续回调 趋势上方承压,行业资讯土壤环境监测中原子吸收光谱法的应用研究国内较大的真空镀膜玻璃项目落户靖边,行业资讯城市土壤环境监测点位布设应用的研究丘陵地区农田土壤信息监测系统的研究(二)周至农田土壤通气性监测技术开发与科普宣传光伏业疾呼完善电价补贴解困,行业资讯安徽淮北:开展网络消费警示宣传我国光伏企业探索转型之路,行业资讯OGS异军突起 Touch China 2013上大中触摸屏火热,行业资讯湖北省市场监管局曝光15起典型违法广告案例中证货物:市场整体向好 玻璃延续反弹,行业资讯稳住民生重点商品价格 广东佛山在行动中国日用玻璃行业创二代恳谈会在济南召开,行业会议关于环境监测与兵团农田土壤保护的思考重庆开展食品生产许可“一证多址”试点孕妇是否适合食用螺丝专家介绍土壤监测质量保证与质量控制赋能企业高质量发展 浙江绍兴一季度股权融资183亿元农药残留分析实验室的基础条件(一)云思木想首登广东时装周 摩登中国风引时装新风潮青海海西制定印发“法治宣传教育八五规划”广东时装周 尽显东方优雅 中国男装DIKENI亮相污染场地环境土壤监测点位的布设上海一超市每公斤土豆107.8元?市场监管局核实:系工作人员操作失误土壤环境监测技术现状分析农田土壤质量环境监测取样方法平板玻璃行业亟需调整创新,市场研究福建龙岩:把好疫情防控期间网络订餐监管关